<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On file for one year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/04/02/on-file-for-one-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/04/02/on-file-for-one-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/04/02/on-file-for-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/on-file-for-one-year/#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Hah, you bring up an excellent final point that I didn&#039;t consider at first.  That really would consist of scraping the bottom of the barrel.  I know, in my case, it&#039;s going to be pointless for any of these companies I&#039;m &quot;on file&quot; with to contact me, because at that point I&#039;ll already be working at one of the places that did give me a job offer.  It really is quite the pathetic applicant who hasn&#039;t secured a job many months down the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, you bring up an excellent final point that I didn&#8217;t consider at first.  That really would consist of scraping the bottom of the barrel.  I know, in my case, it&#8217;s going to be pointless for any of these companies I&#8217;m &#8220;on file&#8221; with to contact me, because at that point I&#8217;ll already be working at one of the places that did give me a job offer.  It really is quite the pathetic applicant who hasn&#8217;t secured a job many months down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arensb</title>
		<link>http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/04/02/on-file-for-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>arensb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/index.php/2007/04/02/on-file-for-one-year/#comment-864</guid>
		<description>I think I remember one case where we filled a position, and then another similar position opened up (possibly in another department; my memory&#039;s hazy) and old resumes were pulled out and reexamined. Or maybe we just talked about it.

At any rate, this doesn&#039;t disprove your main thesis. And since job-hunters pretty much understand that &quot;we&#039;ll keep your resume on file&quot; means &quot;we don&#039;t want you now, and don&#039;t expect to hear from us again&quot;, the only people you&#039;d get by trawling old resumes are the people who haven&#039;t managed to get a job in however many months the resume has been languishing in your files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I remember one case where we filled a position, and then another similar position opened up (possibly in another department; my memory&#8217;s hazy) and old resumes were pulled out and reexamined. Or maybe we just talked about it.</p>
<p>At any rate, this doesn&#8217;t disprove your main thesis. And since job-hunters pretty much understand that &#8220;we&#8217;ll keep your resume on file&#8221; means &#8220;we don&#8217;t want you now, and don&#8217;t expect to hear from us again&#8221;, the only people you&#8217;d get by trawling old resumes are the people who haven&#8217;t managed to get a job in however many months the resume has been languishing in your files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.211 seconds -->

