<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veropedia launches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veropedia: Wikipedia mit Qualitätskontrolle - The Inquirer DE</title>
		<link>http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/comment-page-1/#comment-35055</link>
		<dc:creator>Veropedia: Wikipedia mit Qualitätskontrolle - The Inquirer DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/#comment-35055</guid>
		<description>[...] / Cyde Weys Musings  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] / Cyde Weys Musings  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshuaZ</title>
		<link>http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/comment-page-1/#comment-9810</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshuaZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/#comment-9810</guid>
		<description>Hey, your blog entry is now cited on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veropedia (and yes, you are a reliable source for this purpose as a primary talking about your own thing). Actually, trying to help out that stub and getting repeated nasty tags made me understand a little bit how all the people who feel like our tagging system is really hostile and makes them feel unwanted. I&#039;m really going to need to rethink my attitude on that. I mean, I&#039;m even used to the system, I know what the standards are, and I felt a bit irritated. Anyways, I hope everything is going better with you than it was the last time we talked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, your blog entry is now cited on Wikipedia: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veropedia" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veropedia</a> (and yes, you are a reliable source for this purpose as a primary talking about your own thing). Actually, trying to help out that stub and getting repeated nasty tags made me understand a little bit how all the people who feel like our tagging system is really hostile and makes them feel unwanted. I&#8217;m really going to need to rethink my attitude on that. I mean, I&#8217;m even used to the system, I know what the standards are, and I felt a bit irritated. Anyways, I hope everything is going better with you than it was the last time we talked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/comment-page-1/#comment-9537</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/#comment-9537</guid>
		<description>The parser checks for everything that can reasonably be checked by a computer without the development of strong AI.  Thus it isn&#039;t able to check for content.  But it does check for spelling, broken external links, maintenance tags, links to disambiguation pages, non-free images, incorrectly formatted citations, and a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parser checks for everything that can reasonably be checked by a computer without the development of strong AI.  Thus it isn&#8217;t able to check for content.  But it does check for spelling, broken external links, maintenance tags, links to disambiguation pages, non-free images, incorrectly formatted citations, and a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Kohs</title>
		<link>http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/comment-page-1/#comment-9534</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Kohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/14/veropedia-launches/#comment-9534</guid>
		<description>Hey Cyde...  Just curious if you could elaborate on what sorts of &quot;flaws&quot; are being checked and corrected.  Are we just talking about spelling errors and subject-verb agreement?  Or would the content flaws as found on a nightmare article like &quot;History of West Eurasia&quot; also be corrected?  I just feel like the content flaws are going to be the more troublesome to spot, and certainly more troublesome to &quot;fix up&quot; in Wikipedia, when you consider that biased, anonymous admins are lording over certain articles and quickly revert any attempts to &quot;fix up&quot; the deliberate bias in the articles.  (E.g., see Wikipedia for circumcision, PETA, Lyndon LaRouche, Indie rock, Tourism apartheid, and Ayurveda.  Some would say they are quite beyond &quot;fixing&quot;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Cyde&#8230;  Just curious if you could elaborate on what sorts of &#8220;flaws&#8221; are being checked and corrected.  Are we just talking about spelling errors and subject-verb agreement?  Or would the content flaws as found on a nightmare article like &#8220;History of West Eurasia&#8221; also be corrected?  I just feel like the content flaws are going to be the more troublesome to spot, and certainly more troublesome to &#8220;fix up&#8221; in Wikipedia, when you consider that biased, anonymous admins are lording over certain articles and quickly revert any attempts to &#8220;fix up&#8221; the deliberate bias in the articles.  (E.g., see Wikipedia for circumcision, PETA, Lyndon LaRouche, Indie rock, Tourism apartheid, and Ayurveda.  Some would say they are quite beyond &#8220;fixing&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.283 seconds -->

